top of page
Articles addressing construction disputes on federal projects including cure notices, rework determinations, contract compliance disputes, and government enforcement actions.
Shop Drawings in Federal Construction: What They Are — and What They Are Not
Introduction Shop drawings play an important role in federal construction projects, particularly where fabrication, system coordination, or installation sequencing must be clearly documented before work begins. Despite their importance, shop drawings are frequently misunderstood by contractors and project personnel. Contractors sometimes interpret approved shop drawings as authorization to modify contract requirements or to proceed with fabrication without further verificatio
jason36550
4 min read
The Federal Construction Submittal Process: Why an Approved Submittal Is Not Government Approval
Introduction The submittal process is one of the most important administrative procedures governing federal construction projects. Contractors frequently interpret approved submittals as authorization to proceed with installation of materials or systems. In reality, federal construction contracts clearly state that submittal approval does not constitute Government approval of deviations from the contract requirements. Submittal procedures are typically established in Specific
jason36550
3 min read
What Happens After a Cure Notice on a Federal Construction Contract
Federal construction contracts provide the Government with several mechanisms for addressing contractor performance issues. One of the most significant of these mechanisms is the Cure Notice . Contractors sometimes misunderstand what a Cure Notice represents and how it affects the contract. A Cure Notice is a formal communication issued by the Government when the Contracting Officer believes that the contractor’s performance places the contract in danger of termination for de
jason36550
3 min read
Rework Is Not a Delay: What Federal Construction Contracts Actually Say
Introduction Construction projects frequently encounter situations where installed work does not meet the requirements of the contract. When this occurs, the contractor is required to correct the deficient work. Contractors sometimes argue that correcting the work constitutes a project delay caused by the Government. Under federal construction contracts, this argument is generally incorrect. The contract framework distinguishes between correcting defective work and Governmen
jason36550
3 min read
The Most Misused Process in Federal Construction: The RFI
Federal Contract Administration The Most Misused Process in Federal Construction: The RFI In federal construction, few processes are misunderstood more frequently than the Request for Information (RFI). While RFIs are a routine part of construction communication, they are often incorrectly used to request approval of substitutions, propose design changes, or modify contract requirements. These uses fall outside the intended purpose of the RFI process and can create contractua
jason36550
2 min read
RFI vs Submittal vs Variation Request in Federal Construction
Introduction In federal construction, confusion often arises between three common processes: the Request for Information (RFI), the submittal process, and requests to vary from contract requirements. These processes serve different purposes within the contract administration framework, yet they are frequently misused interchangeably. Misunderstanding these procedures can lead to rejected requests, project delays, and disputes between contractors and the Government. Understand
jason36550
3 min read
bottom of page
